In my recent studies I have basically been skimming the surface of what I see to be the dangers that confront us as a society. Now I think that one of the most omnipresent and diabolical things may not be 'The police state/fascism,' 'The inevitable universal warfare state,' 'The coming financial collapse of our economy,' or even the 'Eugenic practices that are currently being carried out against us.' The problem as I see it is that we have been engineered into a society of -"Dumb" - "Fat" - "Lazy" - "Play along to get along" mindless idiots. We are being socially engineered to become what people like Bertrand Russell, Aldous Huxley, and Charles Darwin had wet dreams about! A slave class that will capitulate to anyone who claims to have authority over them!
We need to wake up and Fast! They already placated my fathers generation; and then my own was hijacked to an even more sinister level. Now I fear that my Son's generation may become that final one that is needed to have the highly sought after (By the Elitist Scum) collective minded society that will be enslaved to these self proclaimed "Authorities!" We need to Re-Educate ourselves, and our children in an attempt to not lose the "freedoms" that were "won" for us by previous generations of brave and "active" men and women who would have scoffed at the very idea of spending their lives in a cushy, trinket laden, flatscreen dominated living room!
And of course here is the source of my directed rant today. From knowledgedrivenrevolution.com
-excerpt-
"Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated. When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for a generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen [...]" - 41
1 comment:
I remember thinking of Russell as being a very liberal minded socialist. Kinda' in the same category as Pierre Trudeau. I read Playboy's interview of him once, long ago. Maybe his most lasting benevolent contribution to all will actually be his influence in calling for easier acquisition of divorces from unhappy unions (esp. women, & himself, ... several times) from tyrannical or unfulfilling mates through some of his writing, & as a progressive shrill for 'openness over convention' in emotional relationships.
Despite all this, he was an English Earl, and he fear-mongered (as an intellectual 'provocateur'?) that the world would end soon if it didn't elect a world gov't, arguing for the West's acceptance of a mixture of liberty & communism ~ now here, ... & called socialism. He thought his math & logic 'science' supplied evidence that this would be the natural final state of Earth's "arrived" 'scientific societies', after all the commotion was over & everyone finally settled down into "equality" of the masses ~ as optimal for producers under a ruling class.
I have no idea what position he may have aspired to or been promised, if any, however he had a large influence over this whole NWO directive we face today, even to the point of calling for continental transfers of sizable populations in order to equalize all areas for prosperity, including some advice for eugenicists. However, he was not malevolent, nor was he fully trusted by top puppet-masters ~ he was just really, really mistaken when it came to the ultimate supremacy of human individuality (so far even today, to most, he still seems right; ... we call 'em "Sheeple".) [But, we we can still work at it & hope, Eh? Gulp!]
He mystically discounted individuality, or ignored it & the inalieable rights it carries, almost as if it was an insignificant illusion in all but only a trace number of people. When he spoke of individuality, he was almost always habitually talking about the rights of the elite personages only, of whom he counted himself among. This largely invalidates much of his 'science', as he was an ignoramus in his times regarding the primacy of individual human consciousness as possessed by each person.
Actually this guy said & did some courageous things, considering his times. It could be said that he harmed the NWO as much as he helped it, because he defied them on some very significant issues, esp. when regarding Asia, Vietnam, Palestine, ... . I think he was fined for some writings & events he produced/sponsored ~ behaviour mainly motivated by his extreme preoccupation w/ pacifism & criticism of the concept of nuclear war, which he preached was imminent. He presented himself as a kind of a self-proclaimed early warning system on this topic, & some naively credit his 50's-60's influence w/ politicians East to West as having saved many people from nuclear conflagration. If the average revolutionary for liberty would stick to his integrity as much as Russell did to his deepest pacifist convictions (& his 'science,' albeit based on his limited knowledge of his own narrow collectivist paradigm), freedom would probably progress faster.
I am no fan of anyone who thinks that collectives have authority to usurp individuals by force or threat. Because of the unprecedented success of the early virgin, experimental American capitalist system (~ 1810-1860 +-), I can't help but think that he must have been aware of the superiority of liberty as a "system," but that he simply thought it wasn't practical nor possible anywhere but in the West (the educated, vast worldwide minority.) Given the political history & structure of Earth as he understood it, he walked the fence of overall compromise. Why not? No skin off his semi-royal ass. He still had his stone house to go home to.
I think he may have had enough integrity to have likely changed his mind on a few important matters, since the time he died & today ~ surmising what he would have to have learned up until today had he lived. There are today, & have been through time, innumerably many worse than him. Compared to dishonest, humanoid premeditative criminal dungeon-masters like Brzezinski & Kissinger (evil rating of 8 out of 10), this mid-level bloodline fella' was a kind of non-humorous renaissance 'know-it-all' who loved to hob-nob & project his ego amongst the rich & powerful, & other self-consumed socialites just like himself (maybe a 4, or a 3 out of 10 evil rating.)
Though he may have lacked criminal intent, nevertheless his prolific work is still easily available & popular, & the results couldn't be more conspiratorial. Today, his obsolete stuff still has strong momentum as a standard tool toward spreading the harms of presumptive authoritative collectivism.
Post a Comment